| WHAT DO WE MEAN BY PARTICLE SIZE?
Why is it that the simplest questions are often the hardest to answer?
If we have a sphere, then it's size is easily defined by the diameter (or radius, if you prefer it). Given this single number we can unambiguously calculate the volume, surface area, circumference - or whatever else we may wish to know about the particle. A cube also can be characterised by a single dimension - the length of a side, though the relationships to volume, etc. will be different.
A rod can be characterised by two dimensions - diameter and length. A rectangular prism needs three - length, breadth and height.
In the real world we meet particles of all shapes. Some are spheres, cubes or rods, but most are just irregular lumps. Even the more regular shaped particles may have rough surfaces, which will affect their properties. So how are we going to describe our 'particle size'?
Practically, we cannot measure all of the dimensions of an irregular particle. Even if we put it under a microscope, we only see a 2 dimensional projection of the object which will vary, depending on how the particle is lying. And if we could do a complete measurement, what would we do with all those numbers?
In most cases what we want is a single number, which gives a useful measure of the size of the particle - like the diameter of the sphere. Which is why most particle sizes are reported as the 'diameter of an equivalent sphere'. What does that mean?
|